EPA revokes Enlist Duo registration

toxic chemicalThe EPA has revoked the registration for Enlist Duo which contains 2,4,D. A group of scientists, doctors and business leaders have previously spoken at a congressional hearing and advised Congress to petition the U.S. government to reject an application. The Enlist Duo application is being considered by the USDA and the EPA that would allow the marketing of Enlist Duo; a new generation consisting of a mix of 2,4-D and .

The medical experts advised Congress that the and the corresponding genetically resistant engineered crops would constitute a pubic and cause an environmental catastrophe.

Dow AgroSciences, a subsidiary of Dow Chemical Co, has submitted application for both the 2,4-D and and genetically engineered corn and soybean seeds genetically engineered to be resistant to the 2,4-D/ combination.

The following excerpts are briefings made to the U.S. congress by prominent scientific and medical experts.

“Exposures to in early life can lead to disease in childhood or disease later on in adult life or even old age,” said Dr. Landrigan, dean for global health at of Medicine. “ chemicals can also cross from mother to child during pregnancy and prenatal exposures that occur during the nine months of pregnancy are especially dangerous.”

“Physicians are very concerned about exposure to the combination of 2,4-D and because of the potential lifelong and irreversible effects on the health of vulnerable , including children, pregnant women and farm workers,” said Dr. Thomasson, executive director of Physicians for Social Responsibility. “Policy decisions should take into account the costs that can result from failure to act on the available data on toxic .”

“2,4-D already is permitted by EPA to remain as residues on over 300 different forms of food,” said John P. Wargo, Ph.D., professor of and politics at Yale University. “Spraying millions of additional acres with these chemicals will increase their contamination of soils, surface and groundwater and foods bearing their residues. If applied by aircraft, sprays will drift to adjacent lands, potentially endangering those who reside, go to school or work nearby.”

“The is about to repeat the same mistakes that got us into this predicament,” said Doug Gurian Sherman, Ph.D, senior scientist with Center for Food Safety. “The public must demand policies and research that help adopt proven, ecologically-based farming systems with minimal that are productive, profitable and better for society.”

“The toxic mix is being proposed because alone is no longer working, since its overuse has led to the development of -resistant ‘superweeds’,” said Gary Hirshberg, chairman of Stonyfield Farm and Just It. “This ‘chemical treadmill’ benefits the GE patent holders at the expense of , human health and the environment.”

In June, 35 doctors, scientists and researchers, including Dr. Chensheng (Alex) Lu of Harvard School of Public Health and Dr. Raymond Richard Neutra, a retired division chief of the California Department of Public Health, sent a letter to EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy urging her to deny Dow’s application.

“The risks of approving a new 2,4-D mixture are clear,” said Mary Ellen Kustin, senior policy analyst at the Environmental Working Group. “If approved, the use of 2,4-D would increase three-to-sevenfold by 2020, according to the USDA. The risks are too great and benefits too few to jeopardize public health and the environment.”

EPA is taking this action after realizing that the chemical is more harmful and that the buffer zones required for its use are not adequate to protect from an adverse health impact.

“Instead of looking for genetically engineered silver bullets that result in crop failure, we should be expanding organic agricultural systems that are productive and profitable, protect public health and the environment and slow global climate change,” said Jay Feldman, executive director of Beyond Pesticides.

EPA had approved the use of Enlist Duo in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin, Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and North Dakota, and had intended to approve it in additional areas in the near future.

The suit was filed by Earthjustice and Center for Food Safety, on behalf of Center for Food Safety, Beyond Pesticides, Center for Biological Diversity, Environmental Working Group, the National Family Farm Coalition, and Pesticide Action Network North America. The decision by the EPA is listed here:


Beyond Pesticides

Be Sociable, Share!

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *