ACB calls for parliamentary hearings on GMOs in South Africa.

The African Center for Biosafety (ACB), the South African consumer watch dog organization, is calling  for urgent Parliamentary hearing on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs).  The hearings are to incorporate a transparent review of risk assessment procedures in the interest of public health and provide a venue for public participation in GMO decision.

The ACB has sent the following correspondence to the Portfolio Committee on Agriculture Parliament to facilitate a public hearing:

 Mr. Mlungisi Lulu Johnson Chair: Portfolio Committee on Agriculture Parliament of South Africa e-mail: 23/07/2013

Dear Honourable Mr Johnson,

Recent events, such as the nationwide protests against Monsanto and consumer outrage over the presence of genetically modified (GM) ingredients in well-known brands of baby food, illustrate that the issue of GM food is of great concern to the people of South Africa. Much of this public anger was triggered by the decision, in May 2012, of GMO Executive Council (SA’s GMO regulatory body) to permit the importation of the Dow Chemical Company’s GM maize, dubbed ‘agent orange maize’, engineered to tolerate herbicides based on the highly toxic chemical 2,4-D. As a result of this decision, on the 7th of August 2012 the ACB, with support from the African Christian Democratic Party, submitted a petition to Parliament calling for the reversal of the Executive Council’s decision to approve Dow’s 2,4-D tolerant maize for import and for a review of the GMO decision making process in South Africa. The petition was supported by 18 health professionals and academics, 20 South African organisations and over 7,000 individual signatories. Though this petition was forwarded to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Agriculture we are, over a year later, still unaware as to the status of this matter. In February 2013, undeterred by this wave of negative publicity, the Executive Council approved, to international consternation, an application by Dow for import of its 2,4-D tolerant soybean. South Africa has not imported any maize (GM or otherwise) from the United States in ten yearsi. Dow has sought these import approvals into South Africa to show regulators in the United States that these highly controversial new GM crop varieties will have a potential export market if they are approved; in other words, anticipating that commercial considerations will trump issues around public safety and environmental protection. However, an unprecedented rejection from the American public, including petitions signed by more than 400,000 people and over 8,200 separate objections, have caused the US Department of Agriculture to delay any possible release until 2015 at the earliest, until full environmental impact assessments have been carried out. To compound matters further, it has come to our attention that Dow has applied to the Executive Council for import approval of another 2,4-D tolerant GM maize variety, which is also tolerant to glufosinate (which is to be phased out of use in the European Union by 2017) and glyphosate. This is a variety for which Dow has not even submitted an application for commercial cultivation in the United States!ii Despite this growing maelstrom of public opposition, Dow, and the rest of the biotech industry, continue to develop ever more risky GM crops, and will continue to act with impunity so long as our regulators allow them to do so. In light of this, we call for an urgent Parliamentary hearing into the risk assessment and risk management procedures for GM crops in South Africa and for full transparency and genuine public participation in the GMO decision making process.

The ACB petition can be accessed here.


Be Sociable, Share!

    3 thoughts on “ACB calls for parliamentary hearings on GMOs in South Africa.

    • Pingback: Natural News Blogs African Center for Biosafety is at the forefront of the GMO battle in South Africa. » Natural News Blogs

    • February 23, 2014 at 5:33 am

      No new technology is safe unless correctly scientifically proven as such.
      In our precious country, the poorest of the poor have no option but to exist on staple foods which contain at least 75% GMO contamination, and this is reflected in their health status and aggressiveness.
      Sound nutrition is the foundation of a healthy and prosperous nation.
      Treat the cause of the problem, not the symptoms.

    • February 25, 2014 at 11:07 am

      And selected “paid for” research by the manufacturer of the technology does not count. Big Pharma and Biotech are renowned for not publishing the studies that show harmful effects, and only publishing the few that somehow fail to show danger. And of course the researchers being paid handsomely to do the research feel obliged to yield favourable results.


    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.